Industry Discussions

What is a Blinded Experiment in Clinical Trials?


Sometimes participants and researchers’ expectations can significantly influence the outcomes of clinical trials. Therefore, blinded experiments are conducted to maintain neutrality and objectivity. Blinded experiments ensure that the findings are a direct result of the experiment itself, rather than expectations or preconceived notions.


Let’s discuss in detail to thoroughly understand what is a blinded experiment. 

History of Blinding in Clinical Research 

It was back in 1784 when the concept of blinding in experiments first took a documented form. During this time, the French Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism conducted an experiment to test the claims of mesmerism, a popular healing practice proposed by Franz Mesmer. The commissioners used blindfolds to ensure that the subjects could not see the procedures being performed, which aimed to eliminate any visual cues that could influence the outcomes.


Consequently, the 19th century saw a pivotal development with the Nuremberg salt test in 1835. This experiment was led by Friedrich Wilhelm von Hoven. It was one of the first recorded double-blind trials. It challenged the effectiveness of homoeopathic dilutions—all while setting a precedent for controlling bias from both the experimenter’s and the participant’s perspectives.


The advancement of blinding in scientific research continued to evolve with Claude Bernard’s advocacy in the mid-1800s. His seminal work, “Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine,” was published in 1865. It emphasised the importance of blinding not only participants but also researchers. Bernard’s revolutionary ideas promoted objectivity and rigour. These principles became foundational for modern experimental methods.


By the mid-20th century, the practice of blinding had become ingrained in the methodology of clinical research—particularly through the widespread adoption of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). It is worth noting that RCTs often employ double-blinding techniques to ensure that neither the subjects nor the researchers know who receives the treatment and who receives the placebo. We can say that this development indeed promoted blinding as an effective way to minimise bias and enhance the reliability of study results.

What is a Blinded Experiment? 

A blinded experiment is a scientific study where some information about the experiment is withheld from the participants, researchers, and assessors to prevent their biases from affecting the results. The blinded experiment can either be single, double, or triple. 


It is conducted for maintaining the integrity of the data and ensuring that the outcomes are influenced solely by the experiment itself—rather than by the expectations or prior knowledge.

What Are Some Notable Examples of Blinded Experiments?

  • Salk Polio Vaccine Trial (1954): This was one of the largest double-blind placebo-controlled field trials in medical history, involving over 1.8 million children. The trial assessed the effectiveness of the polio vaccine developed by Jonas Salk and significantly contributed to the eventual control of the disease.

  • Rosenhan Experiment (1973): This famous psychological experiment involved pseudo-patients who feigned hallucinations to gain admission to psychiatric hospitals. The study was designed to determine the validity of psychiatric diagnoses, and the hospital staff were unaware that the admitted pseudo-patients were actually researchers.

  • Minnesota Coronary Experiment (1968-1973): This double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between diet and heart disease. Participants were either given a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol or a control diet, with outcomes related to heart disease recorded.

  • Randomised Controlled Trials of Aspirin (late 20th century): Numerous double-blind studies assessed the efficacy of aspirin in preventing heart attacks. These studies were crucial in establishing guidelines for aspirin use in patients at risk of cardiovascular events.

What are Different Types of Blinded Experiments? 

There are four different levels of blinding—which are designed to reduce the potential influence of expectations, knowledge, and behaviour on the outcome of the study. However, only three types of blinded experiments are commonly used. It is worth noting that each level of blinding is chosen based on the nature of the study and the degree of impartiality required.

Single Blind Experiment

In a single-blind experiment, the participants do not know key details about the experiment, such as whether they are receiving the treatment or a placebo. 


This type of blinded experiment is used to prevent participants’ expectations from affecting the results, particularly in studies involving subjective outcomes.

Double Blind Experiment

Double-blinding is the gold standard in research design, especially in clinical trials. In this setup, neither the participants nor the experimenters (researchers, clinicians, or others directly interacting with the participants) know who is receiving the actual treatment and who is receiving a placebo. 


This type of blinded experiment helps eliminate bias from both the participants and the experimenters, making the results more reliable.

Triple Blind Experiment

Triple-blinding extends the concealment of information to include the third party involved, often the data analysts or the committee monitoring the results. Neither the participants, the experimenters, nor those analysing the data know which group the subjects are in until the study is completed. 


This type of blinded experiment is useful in preventing data analysis from being influenced by any preconceptions about the expected effects of the treatments.

Quadruple Blind Experiment

Though less common, quadruple-blinding involves an additional layer of blinding where the parties responsible for the interpretation of the data analysis are also blinded. This might include independent committees reviewing the study before publication. 


Quadruple-blinding is used in highly sensitive or critical studies where even the slightest bias must be eliminated to uphold the integrity of the research.

How Does a Blinded Experiment Reduce Bias? 

Do you know what—the process of blinding is also known as masking. That’s because it conceals certain information from participants, researchers, or both. Just to minimise various forms of bias that can distort study outcomes. 


Here’s how a blinded experiment reduces bias:


Participant Bias: In clinical trials and behavioural studies, participants might change their behaviour if they know which treatment they are receiving. This change could be due to their expectations, hopes, or beliefs about the efficacy of the treatment. For example, a participant who knows they are receiving a new experimental drug might report improvements due to the placebo effect rather than the drug’s actual efficacy. Indeed, blinding the participants prevents this by ensuring they do not know whether they are receiving the treatment or a placebo, thus their responses are more likely to be genuine reflections of the treatment’s effects.


Observer or Experimenter Bias: Researchers might unintentionally influence the study outcome if they know which participants are receiving which treatments. This can happen through subtle cues or differences in how they interact with participants, record data, or even in the attention they provide. For instance, in a double-blind experiment, where both the participants and the experimenters do not know who is assigned to each group, such biases are minimised. The researchers treat all participants equally without any preconceived notions about who should respond better, leading to more accurate and objective data collection.


Analysis Bias: Data analysts might be influenced by their expectations or hopes for the study outcome. If analysts know which data set comes from the treated group versus the control group, they might (even subconsciously) interpret ambiguous data in a way that supports the efficacy of the treatment. For example, in triple-blind studies, where the analysts are also blinded, this type of bias is reduced. The data are analysed without any knowledge of group assignments, which promotes impartiality in data interpretation.


Confirmation Bias: This is a common psychological tendency where people look for information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs and ignore information that contradicts them. In the context of research, if scientists have a hypothesis, they might unconsciously look for results that confirm it. We can say that blinding helps reduce confirmation bias by ensuring that the researchers do not know which participants are expected to improve, thus they are more likely to report results objectively.

What Happens When a Blinded Experiment Fails?

When a blinded experiment fails, it typically happens because participants, researchers, or analysts become unblinded before the study concludes. This failure reintroduces bias into the experiment. 


For example, if participants discover their treatment status, they may change their behaviour based on their expectations or perceptions of the treatment, thus impacting the study outcomes.


Similarly, researchers aware of participant treatment groups may treat subjects differently, whether consciously or unconsciously, affecting the results. In data analysis, knowing which data come from the treatment or control group may bias the analysts’ interpretations, which leads to incorrect conclusions.


It is important to understand that a failed blinded experiment compromises the integrity of the study. It can lead to false conclusions, which may influence clinical guidelines, policy decisions, and future research. Therefore, maintaining the blind is crucial to ensure that study conclusions accurately reflect the intervention’s effects without external biases.

Final Words 


Blinded experiments reduce bias, ensuring study results accurately reflect the true effects of the treatment, not external influences. This boosts credibility and reliability in scientific findings and strengthens study conclusions. Researchers must prioritise rigorous blinding to uphold the highest standards of scientific integrity and ethical practice.

Related Articles

ctms | clinical trial management system | clinical research

The Ultimate Guide to Understanding What is a CTMS

A Clinical Trial Management System (CTMS) is a specialised, all-encompassing project management software tailored to guide a research team from the study’s inception—through the enrolment and oversight phases to the study’s conclusion… 


How Much Does a Clinical Trial Management System Cost | ctms cost

How Much Does a Clinical Trial Management System Cost

CTMS cost directly influences decision-making and budget planning for clinical trial research organisations. It is mandatory to accurately assess the costs associated with setup, customisation, maintenance, and user training. It is crucial for a thorough cost-benefit analysis. In fact, transparent and scalable pricing helps organisations plan financially and ensures that the system can adapt to changing needs without unforeseen expenses.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top

Let's meet

Learn how to optimise your site! Join us for valuable lessons, in-depth discussion, and an exclusive demo of our AQ platform