What Does an MHRA Inspector Look For in a Pharmacy Site File?

One kit number pulled as a crimson thread through five stacked pharmacy records: receipt, storage, prescription, dispensing and disposition

An MHRA inspector looks in a pharmacy site file for evidence that the site can rebuild the history of any unit of investigational medicinal product on demand. This guide covers the notification and dossier, what is requested and in what order, the walkthrough, the single unit trace and how findings are graded.

Who Releases IMP to a UK Site, and What Is QP Release?

Two keys turning one lock: a Qualified Person certifies the batch and the sponsor releases the pharmacy, and both must turn before a first dispense

A Qualified Person releases an IMP batch by certifying it, and the sponsor releases that stock to a named site. This guide covers QP certification, the MIA(IMP) behind it, how an imported product reaches a UK site, the green light to dispense, and which release documents a pharmacy files.

IMP Labelling Requirements for UK Trials

Six regulation 46(1) particulars converging on one clinical trial medicine label, which identifies one pack for one participant

IMP labelling requirements for UK trials are set by regulation 46 of the Clinical Trials Regulations, as amended from 28 April 2026. This guide covers the particulars a full label must show, which labelling set applies to which product, who may apply or change a label, and expiry extension at site.

Blinding in the Pharmacy: Keeping the Secret and Breaking It in an Emergency

Blinding in the pharmacy: a trial kit label showing only kit number 1047, with the treatment allocation sealed below a break line and released for one emergency

Blinding in the pharmacy means holding the treatment allocation out of reach of the trial team, and releasing it for one participant when a clinical emergency requires it. This guide covers who may know what is inside a kit, what ICH E6(R3) section 2.11 requires, how a code break runs, and what is recorded.

Delegation and Training: Why Who Did It Matters as Much as What Was Done

Balance scale weighing what was done against who did it, illustrating that authority is part of the pharmacy delegation and training record

A pharmacy record entry counts as evidence when the person who made it was delegated that activity and trained for it on the day. This guide covers the authorised-and-trained condition, what a delegation log records, which activities need documenting, training currency, and what an inspector asks.

What Does ICH E6(R3) Require of IMP Management at the Site?

ICH E6(R3) section 2.10: the IMP management task moves to the pharmacy while responsibility stays anchored with the investigator

ICH E6(R3) requires the investigator or institution to hold responsibility for IMP management at the site, and section 2.10 sets that duty out in nine clauses. This guide takes each clause as it applies at a UK site, the conditions on delegating to a pharmacist, and where the sponsor’s duty begins.

IMP vs NIMP: Which Products Need Trial-Grade Records?

One medicine forking into two record paths, a long unit-by-unit IMP ledger and a short NIMP record set by the protocol

An investigational medicinal product needs a trial-grade record, and a non-investigational medicinal product needs the record its protocol specifies. This guide covers who fixes each product’s class, the record each class attracts at a UK site, and how a misclassification breaks the pharmacy log.

Why the Hospital Pharmacy Stock System Is Not a Trial Record

One stock line for product NGH-017 quantity 24 resolving into individually numbered kit records, with kit 1047 dispensed to participant 017-012

A hospital pharmacy stock system is built to control the trust’s inventory, and a trial record has to account for each numbered unit against a participant. This guide covers what a stock system evidences, the per-participant and audit trail gaps, and how a site holds both records without drift.

Paper Accountability Logs vs an Electronic Pharmacy Record

An IMP accountability log entry shown above the earlier versions of itself, illustrating that both formats hold the entry and only one holds its history

A paper accountability log and an electronic pharmacy record hold the same facts about the same units of IMP. This guide compares them on where errors enter, how a correction is made, what a retrospective reconciliation costs, the storage and retrieval effort, and the monitoring effort.

RTSM and IRT vs the Pharmacy Record: Which Holds What?

RTSM in clinical trials: the sponsor's randomisation and trial supply system and the site pharmacy record meeting at one shared kit number

An RTSM or IRT system holds the sponsor’s randomisation, kit allocation and study-wide supply position. The site pharmacy record holds custody of the units that arrived and what pharmacy did with each. This guide covers what each owns, the four handover points, and why a site keeps its own ledger.

Free guides · PDF
Find the right guide for you

Pick a module, your organisation type, or both — we'll match the guides and email them to you.

Most popular guides
Explore
15+ guides

Free guides · PDF

Guides matched to you.

✓ Written for first-in-human & Phase 1 sites

✓ Inspection-ready checklists & templates

✓ Aligned to MHRA, FDA & EU Annex 11